<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.keiths-place.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>PC&amp;#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Windows vulnerability may be the worst yet</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Hold on to your hats everyone, it&#039;s happening again...
&lt;p&gt;
A new, remotely executable, exploit for XP and Vista has been demonstrated and depending on upon how a worm will use it (a worm is sure to be developed for this), this could make Slammer and Sapphire look like cake-walks.  I hope I&#039;m wrong (but I&#039;m probably not).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs">PC&amp;#039;s</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:04:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">207 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BackupHDDVD confirmed as effective</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/backuphddvd-confirmed-effective</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/image/view/83/thumbnail&quot; alt=&quot;HD DVD&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;It has been interesting to watch events thus far unfold as a community of skilled individuals sprang up around BackupHDVD, and as of a couple of days ago it has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=119871&amp;amp;page=32&quot;&gt;positively confirmed&lt;/a&gt; that AACS has been bypassed.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/backuphddvd-confirmed-effective&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/backuphddvd-confirmed-effective#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/media-0">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs">PC&amp;#039;s</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:02:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows Vista and the cost of DRM</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As it happens I had made my decision to not adopt Vista before I found the following report, but it underscores a number of my concerns about the platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peter Gutmann (of Auckland university) has produced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt&quot;&gt;A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/media-0">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs">PC&amp;#039;s</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:34:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
