<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.keiths-place.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Operating Systems</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Arthur W. Burks, early computer theorist, dies.</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/arthur-w-burks-early-computer-theorist-dies</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Ah dammit, how did I miss this?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
19-May-2008 - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/19/technology/19burks.html&quot;&gt;Arthur W. Burks, Early Computer Theorist, dies&lt;/a&gt;.  Burks worked on Eniac, (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_W._Burks&quot;&gt;amongst other things&lt;/a&gt;) and wasn&#039;t one of the &amp;quot;old guard&amp;quot; so much as he was part of the &amp;quot;original guard&amp;quot;.  I guess there aren&#039;t many left.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/arthur-w-burks-early-computer-theorist-dies#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/computing">Computing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">241 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Windows vulnerability may be the worst yet</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Hold on to your hats everyone, it&#039;s happening again...
&lt;p&gt;
A new, remotely executable, exploit for XP and Vista has been demonstrated and depending on upon how a worm will use it (a worm is sure to be developed for this), this could make Slammer and Sapphire look like cake-walks.  I hope I&#039;m wrong (but I&#039;m probably not).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/new-windows-vulnerability-may-be-worst-yet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs">PC&amp;#039;s</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:04:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">207 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to telnet to a POP server that requires SSL</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/how-telnet-pop-server-requires-ssl</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;If you are anything like me, then every now and then you want to access a mail (POP3) server directly to sort out a problem without having a &amp;quot;helpful&amp;quot; email client get in the way.  In these cases connecting to port 110 with telnet is the way to go.
&lt;p&gt;
But what about when the mail server has been set up to not allow plan-text connections (i.e. an SSL connection must be used)?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/how-telnet-pop-server-requires-ssl&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2008/how-telnet-pop-server-requires-ssl#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/how">How To</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:18:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Leopards can&#039;t change their spots</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/leopards-cant-change-their-spots</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
As both a Mac user and industry &amp;quot;interested party&amp;quot; I have been watching the ongoing problems with Leopard (v10.5) with a great deal of interest, and I am struck by three feelings:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/leopards-cant-change-their-spots&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/leopards-cant-change-their-spots#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:18:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">190 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>GMT timezone problem in Mac OS X</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/gmt-timezone-problem-mac-os-x</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I have had an odd problem with my timezone settings on my Mac over the last few days, I went on holiday recently and (of course) I took my Mac, when I went to change the timezone I discovered that the settings would not &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot;, and instead of going back to the timezone I started with, actually went to GMT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, I worked out what the problem was, so I thought I should post the solution in case anyone else has runs across the same thing.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/gmt-timezone-problem-mac-os-x&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blogs/keith/2007/gmt-timezone-problem-mac-os-x#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/how">How To</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:50:36 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">187 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows Vista and the cost of DRM</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As it happens I had made my decision to not adopt Vista before I found the following report, but it underscores a number of my concerns about the platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peter Gutmann (of Auckland university) has produced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt&quot;&gt;A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/windows-vista-and-cost-drm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/media-0">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware/pcs">PC&amp;#039;s</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:34:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On NOT choosing Windows Vista</title>
 <link>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/not-choosing-windows-vista</link>
 <description>Whatever you may think of Windows Vista there are two things you do have to give it:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It is very pretty
&lt;li&gt;It really &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; advance the Windows platform
&lt;/ol&gt;
However it also, in my opinion at least, contains quite a few downsides which one of these days I might even get around to detailing, but they include: licensing, security, DRM, process and memory management, user permissions, etc.
In any case, I have decided that despite being a owner/user of Windows for more years than I care to count Windows XP will probably be the last version of Windows I will own.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/not-choosing-windows-vista&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.keiths-place.com/blog/keith/2007/not-choosing-windows-vista#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/hardware">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.keiths-place.com/news/software/operating-systems">Operating Systems</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:20:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16 at http://www.keiths-place.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

